Re: Patches for trivial bugs sitting in bugzilla -> trivial patch policy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2014-06-26 11:17, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 26 June 2014 17:02, Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 from me!

If it's a trivial patch then I think it makes sense to just do it.
 From someone that touches hundreds of different projects every month,
I've found it's better to ask forgiveness than permission :)

As previously stated, that only works if you are a provenpackager. The question is for those of us who are not, but are trying to help.

This seems to be particularly needed around mass rebuilds, which IMHO should be an "all-hands-on-deck" time. For example, I've been going through the sizable F21FTBFS list[1][2], looking for arm-specific bugs and fixing what else I can along the way. So far most of my ~100 patches are just bitrotting in bugzilla, while branching is less than two weeks away.

As a newcomer to Fedora development, is there something else I should doing to get these patches reviewed and committed?


Yaakov Selkowitz

[1] http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f21-failures.html
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105908

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux