On 2014-06-27 10:17, Till Maas wrote:
Yes, I missed this as well. Also IIRC the guidelines demand an patch status comment for each patch in the spec file, so just adding patch without noting why it is not upstreamable or information about when/how it was upstreamed is bad and should IMHO not be done by provenpackagers.
When patching others' code, I generally follow the existing style; I can tell you that *many* packages don't have these patch comments. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
But that does raise the question of whose responsibility it is to upstream patches, the contributor or the package maintainer?
Yaakov Selkowitz -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
