On 04/09/2014 02:07 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 04/08/2014 03:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
not sure that the ruby scl should have its own change. It needs to have
the equivalent filed for the fpc to evaluate, though.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)#SCL_Approval_Process
Since the guidelines aren't final, probably open an fpc ticket so the
fpc sees the request and more that it's needed for the fedora scl
change. Although the scl package guidelines aren't final, the
guidelines/criteria for approving the scl itself were approved so fpc
should be able to evaluate it in parallel to finishing the packaging
guidelines.
If we remove the ruby scl change we should add more to the main scl
change, though, about expectations around the scl approval. For
instance, we probably want to touch base with docs/marketing to see if
they want to publicize scls in the exact same way as fedora changes or
have a slightly different procedure.
Also note, in case no one saw it in either fpc or fesco meeting notes,
I'm traveling to a week and a half conference now followed by a week and
a half of vacation.so I likely won't be around for any fedora meetings
until april 27th (and playing catch up with my email for that first week.)
-Toshio
I'm trying to provide feature needed by Cloud WG, that's all. I can
file a new ticket on FPC, but wouldn't it just duplicate
communication about General SCL guidelines?
Ruby193 could test workflow around SCL in Fedora, that's another good
reason to try how far can I get it and what won't work :)
I would prefer to keep my changes as is and let FESCo decide.
I sense a miscommunication here -- the Draft Guidelines for approving an SCL
say that you need to get the FPC to approve new SCLs:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_%28draft%29#SCL_Approval_Process
I felt that a new FPC ticket would be good because this is the first SCL to
be approved and the FPC likely won't become aware of it unless it's called
out in a ticket.
-Toshio
Ok, that's new. It would be great to actually know, which part of
guidelines were already approved and which not. I'm following meeting
minutes and sometimes looked at logs from FPC, but I probably missed
those changes.
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/419
Also you should probably add category in FPC ticket.
Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
