On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 04/08/2014 03:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > >not sure that the ruby scl should have its own change. It needs to have > >the equivalent filed for the fpc to evaluate, though. > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)#SCL_Approval_Process > > > >Since the guidelines aren't final, probably open an fpc ticket so the > >fpc sees the request and more that it's needed for the fedora scl > >change. Although the scl package guidelines aren't final, the > >guidelines/criteria for approving the scl itself were approved so fpc > >should be able to evaluate it in parallel to finishing the packaging > >guidelines. > > > >If we remove the ruby scl change we should add more to the main scl > >change, though, about expectations around the scl approval. For > >instance, we probably want to touch base with docs/marketing to see if > >they want to publicize scls in the exact same way as fedora changes or > >have a slightly different procedure. > > > >Also note, in case no one saw it in either fpc or fesco meeting notes, > >I'm traveling to a week and a half conference now followed by a week and > >a half of vacation.so I likely won't be around for any fedora meetings > >until april 27th (and playing catch up with my email for that first week.) > > > >-Toshio > > > > > > > I'm trying to provide feature needed by Cloud WG, that's all. I can > file a new ticket on FPC, but wouldn't it just duplicate > communication about General SCL guidelines? > Ruby193 could test workflow around SCL in Fedora, that's another good > reason to try how far can I get it and what won't work :) > > I would prefer to keep my changes as is and let FESCo decide. > I sense a miscommunication here -- the Draft Guidelines for approving an SCL say that you need to get the FPC to approve new SCLs: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_%28draft%29#SCL_Approval_Process I felt that a new FPC ticket would be good because this is the first SCL to be approved and the FPC likely won't become aware of it unless it's called out in a ticket. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgptcj8IOVaVU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
