Re: Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-08)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/08/2014 03:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

On Apr 7, 2014 10:28 AM, "Marcela Mašláňová" <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
 >
 > WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC, 17:00 Central Europe, 12:00 (noon)
Boston, 9:00 San Francisco, 1:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
 >
 > == Topic ==
 > I sent three Change proposals. If you have any comments, please share
them.
 > * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SCL
 > * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Playground_repository
 > * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL
 >
not sure that the ruby scl should have its own change.  It needs to have
the equivalent filed for the fpc to evaluate, though.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)#SCL_Approval_Process

Since the guidelines aren't final, probably open an fpc ticket so the
fpc sees the request and more that it's needed for the fedora scl
change.  Although the scl package guidelines aren't final, the
guidelines/criteria for approving the scl itself were approved so fpc
should be able to evaluate it in parallel to finishing the packaging
guidelines.

If we remove the ruby scl change we should add more to the main scl
change, though, about expectations around the scl approval.  For
instance, we probably want to touch base with docs/marketing to see if
they want to publicize scls in the exact same way as fedora changes or
have a slightly different procedure.

Also note, in case no one saw it in either fpc or fesco meeting notes,
I'm traveling to a week and a half conference now followed by a week and
a half of vacation.so I likely won't be around for any fedora meetings
until april 27th (and playing catch up with my email for that first week.)

-Toshio



I'm trying to provide feature needed by Cloud WG, that's all. I can file a new ticket on FPC, but wouldn't it just duplicate communication about General SCL guidelines? Ruby193 could test workflow around SCL in Fedora, that's another good reason to try how far can I get it and what won't work :)

I would prefer to keep my changes as is and let FESCo decide.

Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux