On Apr 7, 2014 10:28 AM, "Marcela Mašláňová" <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC, 17:00 Central Europe, 12:00 (noon) Boston, 9:00 San Francisco, 1:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
>
> == Topic ==
> I sent three Change proposals. If you have any comments, please share them.
> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SCL
> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Playground_repository
> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL
>
not sure that the ruby scl should have its own change. It needs to have the equivalent filed for the fpc to evaluate, though. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)#SCL_Approval_Process
Since the guidelines aren't final, probably open an fpc ticket so the fpc sees the request and more that it's needed for the fedora scl change. Although the scl package guidelines aren't final, the guidelines/criteria for approving the scl itself were approved so fpc should be able to evaluate it in parallel to finishing the packaging guidelines.
If we remove the ruby scl change we should add more to the main scl change, though, about expectations around the scl approval. For instance, we probably want to touch base with docs/marketing to see if they want to publicize scls in the exact same way as fedora changes or have a slightly different procedure.
Also note, in case no one saw it in either fpc or fesco meeting notes, I'm traveling to a week and a half conference now followed by a week and a half of vacation.so I likely won't be around for any fedora meetings until april 27th (and playing catch up with my email for that first week.)
-Toshio
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
