On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I won't speak for all of FESCo, but I'm leaning towards: "Spins can > continue just as they are, while being aware that they continue to be > secondary to our primary deliverables". (Yes, I'm aware of the > KDE-as-release-blocker rule and we'll address that individually). > > So new spins and existing Spins are fine (in my opinion) as long as > someone is caring for and feeding them. Thanks, that's good news. Dan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
