Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29 January 2014 23:58, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps.  I think
> they have value to people.  I think they fill a niche, however large
> or small it might be.  I also think they can be done by the people
> wishing to provide them without relying on Fedora resources for
> hosting and creation (outside of leveraging existing packages and
> repositories).
>
> I don't consider that "getting rid of them" at all.  On the contrary,
> I think it lets people have more control over their spins, allows them
> to refresh them as they see fit throughout the release, and allows
> them to market and promote them beyond a token mention on a Fedora
> website.

Some care is needed, if there are things getting packaged to fill a
role in a spin they may disappear from Fedora if the spin in question
does.

-- 
imalone
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux