-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/2014 10:34 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Stephen Gallagher > <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This is the domain of Fedora Remixes, not Fedora Spins. >> Downstreams are permitted (naturally) to use Fedora packages for >> whatever distribution they want to create. The catch is that they >> have to follow the policies on this page: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Remix >> >> The primary difference is that Fedora Remixes have to provide >> their own website and image hosting, as they are Fedora-derived, >> not Fedora-provided. >> >> The sort of person who does that in Fedora in the first place is >> likely to do so for a Remix if they're using it as well. > > Hi, > > So where do we currently stand with this? > > Are we leaning towards spins going away? > > Are we leaning towards keeping some spins and getting rid of > others? > > What about proposals for new spins? I won't speak for all of FESCo, but I'm leaning towards: "Spins can continue just as they are, while being aware that they continue to be secondary to our primary deliverables". (Yes, I'm aware of the KDE-as-release-blocker rule and we'll address that individually). So new spins and existing Spins are fine (in my opinion) as long as someone is caring for and feeding them. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLww5YACgkQeiVVYja6o6PtYACfUeW9oYycRD7n9b3+kc593KFu gFoAni0WVryNnZp2M7WTioqYXudwFTp2 =GfMO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
