On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:16:16PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > If we decide the alternative desktops are a valuable part of Fedora - > which seems to be a popular opinion - how do we fit them into a > Product-based conception of Fedora? > > We can have a KDE Product, and an Xfce Product, and an LXDE Product, > but...at that point haven't we just re-invented spins? It doesn't seem > to quite work with the Product conception. I would like to see Products defined by the problem space that they are aimed at rather than the technology they're based on. That is, a "Fedora Scientific Desktop" is a lot more compelling to me than "Fedora KDE" -- at least as a product. But I don't think there's anything wrong with Fedora KDE as either a spin or something else. For that matter, there could be a "Fedora GNOME" spin distinct from the Fedora Workstation product, if there were people really keen to work on it, perhap as a showcase of upstream technology without worrying about the concerns of the Fedora Workstation WG's particular area of focus. (With "people keen to work on it" as the really key phrase.) -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
