Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/04/2014 11:11 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> I'm not fond of keeping spins around when we're focusing on
> products. That gives the message that they are second-class
> citizens in Fedora.
> 

To be fair, spins have always been second-class citizens (to a point).
They've always been relegated to a secondary page from the "standard"
install media.

> I'd rather define a process that allows current spins to become
> either sub-products or full-featured products when they meet a set
> of requirements (that is to be defined yet).
> 
> In a contributor-driven community, it shouldn't be a problem to
> accept new products if it is backed appropriately.
> 

This I agree with completely. We need to define a process for how to
promote new Products. I *will* say that such a process will probably
include a requirement that it must be more than just a technology
deliverable (i.e. Just the XFCE Spin renamed). A product will likely
need to define a target not currently served by one of the existing
products (or the overlap will need to be justified).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlLwwyUACgkQeiVVYja6o6NmsQCfTUCY2q3bUKON4vo+J1j9Qnqx
OboAnixXUmp0HGNqqwBtjVv1cth05B2d
=TxoF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux