Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 11:11 +0100, H. Guémar wrote:
> I'm not fond of keeping spins around when we're focusing on products.
> 
> That gives the message that they are second-class citizens in Fedora.

We already have about sixteen 'citizen classes' within the spin system,
as I pointed out in another mail. Exactly one spin is our default
deliverable. Exactly two spins block the release. Exactly six spins are
considered 'desktops' and given increased prominence on the download
page. Etc etc.

There is basically nowhere except https://spins.fedoraproject.org/ ,
which I don't think is a particularly high traffic page, that actually
treats all spins as equal.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux