On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:44:34AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > And that's reasonable. But as we have defined Fedora server as "not > > > anything in particular", that drifts closer and closer to "not a > > > thing". That leaves define release criteria -- let alone blockers. > > Why do you think we in QA are going to be defining release criteria > > surrounding cloud workstation or server? > Matthew's sentence does not parse grammatically at all, which makes it > hard for me to figure out what I'm saying, but he didn't mention 'QA' at > all. Yeah, what? I'm not sure if that's lack of coffee or if I can blame my computer in some way. I think that was supposed to be "That leaves little room to" or something like that. As for what I think... I expect the working groups will work with the QA team experts to define release criteria appropriate for their areas. That's what the board-approved plan says https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora.next/boardproposal#QA. I didn't anticipate that being controversial, but if it is in some way, I'm sure we can figure something out. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
