Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 17:40 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 05:33 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > And that's reasonable. But as we have defined Fedora server as "not anything
> > in particular", that drifts closer and closer to "not a thing". That leaves
> > define release criteria -- let alone blockers.
> >
> 
> Why do you think we in QA are going to be defining release criteria 
> surrounding cloud workstation or server?

Matthew's sentence does not parse grammatically at all, which makes it
hard for me to figure out what I'm saying, but he didn't mention 'QA' at
all.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux