Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 09:48:16 +0100
> Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Dne 6.1.2014 23:26, Chris Murphy napsal(a):
>> > Since "* remove kernel" appears to be inspecific, removing all
>> > kernels isn't what I'd expect. It's not how mv or cp or anything
>> > else would work.
>> >
>>
>> So why not turn this around. In case somebody is doing "dnf remove
>> kernel" and dnf will figures out that there is more packages, then it
>> should fail and ask user to be more specific. That way dnf could
>> behave consistently and user would have to go with "dnf remove
>> kernel*" to explicitly specify, that (s)he wants to remove all
>> kernels.
>>
>> Vít
>
> dnf remove kernel --all

I assume you're suggestion that `dnf remove kernel` should only remove
the latest kernel.

It wouldn't change the fact that removing only the latest installonly
package could most likely remove the running kernel, which is the main
issue here.

>
> ___
> Regards,
> Frank
> www.frankly3d.com
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux