On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:08:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > What if we made this like the "I voted" stickers -- you can get one by > > > > checking a box in the voting app? (Even if, by the way, you cast no actual > > > > votes?) > > > > > > > I had thought that this would trigger off of someone hitting submit on the > > > election page. That should vote 0 for all candidates if no votes are > > > assigned but still meet the trigger condition. Not sure if that meets the > > > criteria for objectors, though. Ralph bean should weigh in here as to > > > whether "logged in during an election period" would also be suitable (which > > > was something that people seemed to think would be acceptable earlier in > > > the thread). > > > > Hm, its not worth doing if we're going to make it complex like this. > > I think we should just drop it. No fedmsg broadcast for votes, only > > for election period opening/closing and only for election results > > publication/retraction by the admin (with obviously no user > > participation data included). > > > > It is just not important enough to: > > > > 1) cause anyone any worry. > > 2) bother engineering a complicated "compromise" solution. > > > > If someone wants to argue that we still try to make it happen, I'll > > hear that and implement it if a consensus is formed. (FWIW, > > personally I'm still all for it). > > I tend to align with Ralph on this. I do think there is interest and even > benefit from having a badge system coupled with the elections. > If only because we have 2436 (on Thu Sep 12 13:56:25 UTC 2013) people registered > on badges while for the last elections we had: > - FESCO: 200 ballots > - Board: 204 ballots Ah, got my number wrong, I must had found an older elections In June 2013 we announce results for Board, FESCo and FAmSCo: - Board: 157 ballots - FESCo: 166 ballots - FAmSCo: 175 ballots source: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2013-June/003166.html And this month, for the F20 release name: 361 ballots source: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2013-September/003181.html Point still stands though. > There is the risk of having people voting just to get the badges, but there is > also the possibility of motivating people to follow the elections and vote > thanks to the badge system. > > However, the discussion here seems to indicate that a number of person do not > like the idea of been marked as "Has voted" (w/o any other information) and > unless more people express their opinion, then so be it :) > > > My 2 cts, > Pierre > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Attachment:
pgpgdM1r0L4_Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
