Re: fedmsg for voting?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sep 10, 2013 8:20 PM, "Ralf Corsepius" <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 09/11/2013 12:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:

>> I think the benefit of encouraging more participation through voting is a
>> reasonable tradeoff for this particular bit of information (voted in a
>> particular election, possibly chosing no candidates). I do think we need to
>> disclose it.
>>
>> Do you feel strongly enough about this that you would refrain from voting in
>> Fedora elections? (Serious question.)
>
> Yes. Votes must be entirely anonymous, as well as their must be no records nor metadata records allowing conclusions about whether an individual has participated in an election.
>
Just for comparison purposes:

- a record of whether an individual voted must be kept to prevent an individual voting multiple times.  All current and past fedora election software has had this information and kept it private.
- a record of who voted for what has been kept since this feature was implemented: fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/30 in 2009.  All election software that recorded this information has kept the information private.

-Toshio

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux