Re: fedmsg for voting?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/11/2013 12:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:53:59PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
But anyway, if people feel really strongly about this, I think the opt out
of badge tracking is an okay approach. (Even if it makes more checkboxes.)
I find it hard to agree that forcing people to opt out of things they
reasonably feel invade their privacy is a road Fedora wants to go
down. But if you all conclude my argument/expectation for privacy in
the case of my voting behavior is unreasonable then proceed.

I think the benefit of encouraging more participation through voting is a
reasonable tradeoff for this particular bit of information (voted in a
particular election, possibly chosing no candidates). I do think we need to
disclose it.

Do you feel strongly enough about this that you would refrain from voting in
Fedora elections? (Serious question.)
Yes. Votes must be entirely anonymous, as well as their must be no records nor metadata records allowing conclusions about whether an individual has participated in an election.

Ralf


--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux