On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 08:58:39AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > it. Yet the "something better" never materialized. When I had a disk go > wrong lately I was notified by the big ugly legacy system. I had *zero* > notification by all the "better" systems that were given as "evidence". > Because the "better" systems do not exist. None of the 'smtpd is legacy" > complainers have actually tried to solve the (remote) notification > problem, none of them actually understand the reliability and operational > constrains, or that being to define message routing (via aliases, Sure they do. I can't imagine an installation of any size (eg more than 2 systems) not using Nagios, Icigna, or some other alerting system. If you're in the narrow case between a desktop system and an installation where real monitoring and alerting is worth it, install an MTA. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
