On Jul 19, 2013 2:16 PM, "Bill Nottingham" <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Miloslav Trmač (mitr@xxxxxxxx) said:
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Billy Crook <billycrook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Please voice yourself at meetings in #fedora-devel if this is important to
> > > you.
> >
> > (Speaking purely for myself and not for other FESCo members,) I do
> > want to hear from Fedora contributors - but I'd much rather hear on
> > the mailing list (where messages arrive over the course of a week or
> > more) rather than during the FESCo meeting (when we have only a few
> > minutes to agree on a decision, and already frequently have two or
> > three parallel subconversations).
>
> I agree with this statement.
>
> In terms of this feature as presented, I'm not seeing why having $MTA in the
> minimal install where you need the installer to have a required configury
> step for it is a proper use of everyone's time that's installing it.
> Enterprise administrators are almost certainly pushing out their own
> configurations directly via puppet/chef/ansible/etc. Desktop users are
> primarily doing it as part of their MUA setup, or just using webmail.
>
> It's not as if the default MTA configuration, as I understand it (no smart
> host, attempt to send all mail directly with the FQDN) is generally useful
> OOTB.
It is to me, and I suspect I am not alone.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
