On 07/16/2013 11:36 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Well, what else is broken? It's a matter of approach - you seem to be saying "what are the minimum requirements, listed so that we can meet them". In terms of a minimum viable platform, for all its faults, the interfaces specified by the LSB might be a worthwhile starting point. But even in that case... if an arch implemented the entire LSB, and 90% of the rest of the distribution did not build, that's obviously not good enough. So I'm more in favor of "tell us what you don't have, and we can discuss whether that's good enough." I don't want to move the goalposts on the ARM effort, but I think it's reasonable to expect that a list of "Known Broken/Deficient items" be available. Does such a list exist?
The list of outstanding ARM bugs is tracked here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245418 -- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
