Brendan Conoboy (blc@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On 07/11/2013 10:41 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >Kernel, glibc, all the core library stacks. And I would argue that yes, this > >*includes* libGL. So llvmpipe needs fixed, outside of any desktops. Should > >we define the core functionality better? Probably. > > I would argue that it does not include libGL because it's not a > requirement for headless deployment scenarios. Why would you argue > for it? Well, as I said (and you cut out) ... I do know what some people want ARM to be in terms of dense hypserscale servers (32/64-bit)... but the community that would be using Fedora ARM does seem to be targeting a wider array than that. ... The F19 ARM release released 5 desktop images. You seem to be arguing that the required featureset of ARM as a primary arch should only be for headless deployment, but the ARM community itself is saying otherwise. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
