On 07/11/2013 12:37 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Well, as I said (and you cut out) ... I do know what some people want ARM to be in terms of dense hypserscale servers (32/64-bit)... but the community that would be using Fedora ARM does seem to be targeting a wider array than that. ... The F19 ARM release released 5 desktop images. You seem to be arguing that the required featureset of ARM as a primary arch should only be for headless deployment, but the ARM community itself is saying otherwise.
Interests differ between participants. If this was the only objection to moving ARM to the primary build system I would say let's drop graphics from official Fedora ARM support for the purposes of the move and make all graphical images respins or remixes.
-- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
