On 11 February 2013 07:15, Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:34:34AM +0000, Ian Malone wrote: >> Gnome 2 slowly returned to the old behaviour in many ways. Gnome 3 is >> starting to do this. >> > > As someone who, I presume, does not like Gnome 3, and as someone who, I will > wildly guess, shares the notion that GNOME devs are doing whatever they want > and not listening to your use cases... > > ...are you certain... > > ...absolutely certain... > > ...that you'd like to be on record setting the precedent that GNOME 3 is > admitting failure by compromising to your standards? > On record? Is there going to be a trial? What frustrates me is it's such an uphill battle. Step 1: Everything changes. Step 2: Users protest, some leave. Step 3: Supporters respond there's nothing wrong and essentially everyone who doesn't like it is too stupid or lazy. Step 4: Users carry on complaining. Step 5: Some features are gradually re-added, without ever acknowledging there was a problem in the first place. Step 6: Minor release? Go to step 4. Step 7: Major release? Go to step 5. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
