On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:50 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah well I'm not so sure how you can actually expect that of the feature > process given how utterly broken that is? > > For the first you are not obligated to participate in the feature process > and even if you did what does the process categorize as an actual feature? > > And I propose that you start lowering your expectations since there is a > proposal floating with FESCo where the main think is that they want to > avoid voting on all features but just decide in details on the bigger > scope/escalated ones to FESCo. The rest will be acked just by announcing > them (and again - anyone can escalate it to FESCo)... I have no idea where you're getting this information, but I haven't seen anyone suggest anything like that. There is a desire to make the Feature process actually worthwhile, but it has nothing to do with blindly acking features. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
