Re: Rawhide boot problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/07/2012 02:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:54:03AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:

Fedora 18 is basically closed for new feature work, and instead the
focus needs to be on integration of the existing feature set and
bugfixes.  But as you state there is a large amount of time before
F18 releases, which means new feature work would have to stall out
for months.  Instead, new feature work can begin for F19 and get
ahead of the game.  That's why F18 and F19 are divergent.  That's
why we went from a single line of development to two.

This makes sense, but it runs directly against the current
auto-inheritence behaviour. It's unsurprising that people end up with
different opinions of the right thing to do here.


I'm of the opinion that rawhide should be inheriting from the builds of the previous release, so long as there haven't been any builds directly on rawhide. I'm also of the opinion that the inheritance should happen as early as possible, eg as soon as the package is built, instead of waiting for a bodhi introduced delay. Rawhide works this way, the inheritance into rawhide should work this way too.

Getting there is a little complicated due to how the fXX-updates-candidate -> fXX-updates-testing -> fXX tag dance works, but I'm confident smart people can figure that out if change is desired here.

--
Help me fight child abuse: http://tinyurl.com/jlkcourage

- jlk
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux