On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:42:20PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 09/07/2012 02:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >This makes sense, but it runs directly against the current > >auto-inheritence behaviour. It's unsurprising that people end up with > >different opinions of the right thing to do here. > > > > I'm of the opinion that rawhide should be inheriting from the builds > of the previous release, so long as there haven't been any builds > directly on rawhide. I'm also of the opinion that the inheritance > should happen as early as possible, eg as soon as the package is > built, instead of waiting for a bodhi introduced delay. Rawhide > works this way, the inheritance into rawhide should work this way > too. Sure, and that's clearly the behaviour that Lennart wanted as well. But instead there was a mass rebuild that bumped his rawhide nvr and now he needs to do rawhide work manually. If development should be happening in rawhide then why is rawhide inheriting from f18? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
