Re: *countable infinities only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 06/18/2012 11:03 AM, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
>
>>> Microsoft has not refused to grant Fedora a key for ARM.
>> >> This I do not understand. By reports in the admittedly
>> incompetent magazines dealing with home computers, Microsoft's
>> policy is to keep Fedora, and any other OSes, except for
>> Microsoft OSes, off all Microsoft Certified ARM devices.
>> >> Perhaps you mean that Fedora has not asked Microsoft for a signing key.
>
> Signing on ARM would use the same key and signing service as x86. We have
> chosen not to pursue this usage due to the inability to disable Secure Boot
> or install your own chain of trust on ARM given the rules they've put > forward.
>
>> Further questions ad ARM: According to Microsoft, can, in future,
>> "SecureBoot" be disabled on Microsoft Certified ARM devices?
>
> On ARM client devices, no, the current requirements do not allow you to
> disable Secure Boot. I don't think the behavior on server hardware is
> specified yet whatsoever.
>
>> Will the person who walks out of the store with a Microsoft
>> Certified ARM device be able to put their own signing key in?
>> What about the PK?
>
> No, not either.
>
> -- > Peter

Thanks very much Peter.

I am sorry not to have in hand today a proper exposition of my
position.  Heaven forwarding, I will get one out soon.

oo--JS.

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux