On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 17.06.2012 01:14, schrieb Chris Murphy:
> >> Please provide an example of a better option, with sufficient detail as to constitute a successful relay of the baton.
> >> The point of the thread from the outset was to explore alternatives, but so far those alternatives are vaporware.
>
>
> Numerous non-vaporware recommendations follow, snipped directly from the thread:
(snip)
These suggestions boil down to:
1) Do nothing
2) Become a hardware vendor
3) Use a Fedora key
None of these solve the problem of getting Fedora onto arbitrary x86
hardware bought towards the end of this year.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think 50 million dollars toward buying, and properly arranging
the UEFI, of several lots of x86 computers would indeed solve
part of the problem you point out.
Why not?
What does Red Hat have to lose?
If Red Hat takes no effective action, then Red Hat will lose much
more than 50 million dollars, and very soon too.
oo--JS.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
