On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 14:26 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> That is not the answer to my question (hint: read the question). > > Indeed, it is not, but do you really want to put in the CLA the > responsibilities of every role past present and future available in the > project ? > Meaning that every time one is added, the CLA changes and thus that > everyone has to re-sign it ? > Good questions. While I think the project could benefit from having at least the top level responsibilities listed in the agreement, this would end up burdening maintainers with legal responsibilities. I don't honestly know what is the best way out. At the same time I don't want to be obliged to support something I don't want to. There are many more important things to deal with in the distribution than a stupid secure boot feature. Thanks, Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
