On 06/02/2012 11:05 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > I am more concerned about the package maintenance level. At the > package maintenance level, it does not make sense to patch against the > upstream decision. On the other hand, a package maintainer should have > the right to not support users filing bugs that potentially originate > from secure boot. This, I think, is equivalent to the fact that a > provenpackager is not responsible for all the packages in the > distribution, although he has the necessary permissions for > modification. Thats a poor analogy. Provenpackagers are not responsible for your packages. You are responsible as a package maintainer for bugs against the package. If you don't want to deal with it, give up the package or find a co-maintainer who will deal with such issues. When you work within a community, it is a project wide decision. Not just personal preference on which bugs you can reasonably ignore. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
