On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > The only Freedom you've lost is that now, in addition to the person-hours to > do the work and monetary cost to host your bits or generate physical media, > you have an additional cost if you wish to have your own cert that will be > accepted out of the box by the next generation of PC hardware. You have as > much equal footing as Fedora does to plunk down the $99 and play along in > the PC sandbox. That's a better deal than Fedora's gpg signing setup. > Hmm, will the package maintainers have the freedom to not support users who have the secureboot enabled? How are we going to detect this? Thanks, Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
