On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cosimo Cecchi wrote: >> I don't want to jump in the technicality of this discussion, but I can >> only hope any "solution" that requires users to fiddle with BIOS >> settings in order to install Fedora won't be seriously considered as >> viable. > > Sorry, but it's the ONLY viable solution. Any "solution" that removes users' > freedom (and that's the case of ANY "solution" which leaves "Secure" Boot > enabled) cannot be seriously considered as viable. Secureboot support does *NOT* limit your freedom as long as it is optional (the default setting does not matter). You are either making more complex for everyone or for those that want do develop kernel development, run out of tree drivers etc. In case enabled secureboot is the only option (i.e we somehow refuse to boot with it disabled) then (and only then) you can talk about removed freedom otherwise this is just FUD. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
