On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 15:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > I would still like you to consider the question of whether this holds > > for the Fedora case, though. Is Fedora as a project in fact suitable - > > either in current implementation, or in terms of our self-definition and > > long term goals - for this whole 'market' you are identifying as a > > single entity? Are we in fact truly interested in producing code for > > these content consumption devices? Is that what we're doing? > > The only way to measure this accurately, like anything else in Fedora, > is by the number of contributors. I will be looking to contribute to the > ARM project in some way in hope that I can one day replace my aging N900 > phone with newer, faster hardware and a real GNU/Linux image. > > Red Hat needs to get into the phone/tablet business: Red Hat Enterprise > Mobile! It doesn't seem like a huge over-reach to assume that any RH interest in ARM is more on the server side than a raging desire to take on Android and the iPad :) (Note: I don't have any sekrit inside info on this. It seems like a reasonable guess, though.) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
