Re: ARM as a primary architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Williamson wrote:
I would still like you to consider the question of whether this holds
for the Fedora case, though. Is Fedora as a project in fact suitable -
either in current implementation, or in terms of our self-definition and
long term goals - for this whole 'market' you are identifying as a
single entity? Are we in fact truly interested in producing code for
these content consumption devices? Is that what we're doing?

The only way to measure this accurately, like anything else in Fedora, is by the number of contributors. I will be looking to contribute to the ARM project in some way in hope that I can one day replace my aging N900 phone with newer, faster hardware and a real GNU/Linux image.

Red Hat needs to get into the phone/tablet business: Red Hat Enterprise Mobile!
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux