Re: ARM as a primary architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/21/2012 07:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
ARM should most definitely NOT be approved as a primary architecture before
all the requirements are actually met!

The dynamics of "when" are very much open to discussion, not to mention "what" that will mean. We need a path to get from secondary to primary. Whether it's designated "primary" at the end of that path or somewhere in the middle is irrelevant- it's about getting ARM handled the Primary Way (TM) during the journey.

We have seen what happened when the EU took Greece's word on the promise
that they'd eventually meet the Maastricht criteria. Let's not do the same
mistake in Fedora!

What?

--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux