Re: ARM as a primary architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Tyler wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 02:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> And finally, for our build speed issue, the practical consideration will
>> be whether the parallelism will actually speed our builds up. Right now
>> our builds are either serial or have portions parallelized with "make
>> -j", which assumes a single multi-CPU computer (but the "multi-core" ARM
>> setups actually present themselves as a multi-computer cluster, which is
>> not supported by "make -j", not as a multi-CPU computer), so the
>> parallelism does little to the latency of an individual build (though of
>> course it does help the overall throughput).
> 
> Actually, there's both: ARM scales to multiple cores per CPU (dual-core
> and quad-core are common, and very high core counts are on the horizon),
> and vendors are preparing many-CPU boxes (e.g., HP Redstone, with 288
> quad core (+1 management core) systems in 4U).

But there are x86 CPUs with more than 4 cores, and multi-CPU SMP systems 
which still present themselves as one (multi-CPU/core) computer. IIRC, our 
x86 Koji builders have 16 cores per machine (might be even more by now, not 
sure).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux