Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/03/12 13:24, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> Well, the whole idea came in a second so someone should refine it.
> FWIW the period should be long enough - in my eyes not less than a
> months so if noone responded in like 3 months the fix would no longer
> be at least quick. And as always we trust people to do the right and
> have a good understanding of their capabilities and knowledge. No
> proposal/technology can prevent bad intentions.
Yes, I guess, many people have very different time frame in their heads.

If we'd like to try this out, what would be the right way to propose
this change?
-- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
               <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux