Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Runge" <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:15:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
> 
> On 02/03/12 13:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > What about bug reporter being unable to fix the mentioned bug?
> Oh no. I'm mean unable to fix because of missing knowledge, not
> unable because of missing commit rights.
> 
> I might file a bug against kernel, but I'm definitely not the right
> person to patch there. (You might substitute kernel with everything
> you want, just to make the picture).
> 
> I'm a bit puzzled by quick-and-dirty 'fixes' which may lead to errors
> somewhere else.

Well, the whole idea came in a second so someone should refine it. FWIW the period should be long enough - in my eyes not less than a months so if noone responded in like 3 months the fix would no longer be at least quick. And as always we trust people to do the right and have a good understanding of their capabilities and knowledge. No proposal/technology can prevent bad intentions.

Alex

> --
> Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>                <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux