On 03/02/2012 01:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 03/02/2012 11:47 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >> Some developers prefer ignore it until they have time. Why should I >> write yes, yes, it's broken, I'll look at it next month. That's not >> helping anyway. > > I disagree it certainly does matter. > > For example let's take these two [1] [2] bugs that are on my components > list for my feature. > > Bug 1 was filed 2011-11-16 and has absolutely no comments. > > Which leaves me wondering.. > > A) is this package being actively maintained? > B) Is it planned for removal? > C) Is there something wrong with the submitted unit file? > D) Are upstream changes necessary for this component to be migrated? > E) Is it safe to flag the component to be package by proven packages? > > Now let's look at bug 2 was also filed 2011-11-16 and has one comment > from the maintainer which came 3 days later. > > "Thanks, I'll test and apply it. Hoping to actually fix the deamon too." > > Now I have the answer to A,B,C,D,E. > > For bug 1 I have to initiate non responsive maintainers policy which > takes 3+ weeks to finish.... > > For bug 2 I can just ping him with status if he has not yet packaged the > submitted unit no later than week before the deadline to ship units comes. > > So as you can see responses do indeed matter. > > JBG > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754358 > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754388 Units again :) Are you trying create some metrics because of units on whole distribution? It simply won't fit to all groups. Marcela -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
