On 03/02/2012 12:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 02.03.2012 12:02, schrieb Marcela Mašláňová: >> Ok, so you'll automatically start non-responsive maintainer process, >> because maintainer didn't work on a one bug. But he might be working on >> different component for whole month. He might be working on a new >> upstream release and not paying attention to low priority bugzillas. > > define "working" > > it is not too much "work" assign a bug of a owned package > to give a sign of life not at least to the submitter even > if we do not speak about any automatism > > if you are working the whole month on a different component > and give no single feedback to a new reported bug you are > ending in frustrated submitters - if they get a "assigned" > they do not feel ignored > > so such automatism does not enforce anything which > should not be mandatory for a package-owner to not > get frustrated users no longer submitting bugreports > because they feel ignored and wasted time do this > Some developers prefer ignore it until they have time. Why should I write yes, yes, it's broken, I'll look at it next month. That's not helping anyway. Marcela -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
