Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2012 11:20 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> I am a feature owner for a feature that involves components in the
> hundreds and is heavily depended on maintainers responsiveness.
> 
> For me to start enacting the non responsive maintainers policy is a
> tremendous work thus I'm wondering if there is something preventing us
> from automating the non responsive maintainer policy?
> 
> An bugzilla script that acts something like if maintainer has not
> responded to a bug report with the status new in a week ( or some other
> time ) the non responsive maintainers policy automatically starts taking
> effect.
Ok, so you'll automatically start non-responsive maintainer process,
because maintainer didn't work on a one bug. But he might be working on
different component for whole month. He might be working on a new
upstream release and not paying attention to low priority bugzillas.

You should take more parameters than one bug to kick someone from Fedora.

Marcela

> 
> To get out of that automatic non responsive process the maintainer would
> have to comment on the bug and set it's status assigned ( or something
> similar ).
> 
> JBG
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux