----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthias Runge" <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:34:11 PM > Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy > > On 02/03/12 13:24, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Well, the whole idea came in a second so someone should refine it. > > FWIW the period should be long enough - in my eyes not less than a > > months so if noone responded in like 3 months the fix would no > > longer > > be at least quick. And as always we trust people to do the right > > and > > have a good understanding of their capabilities and knowledge. No > > proposal/technology can prevent bad intentions. > Yes, I guess, many people have very different time frame in their > heads. > > If we'd like to try this out, what would be the right way to propose > this change? I really have no idea nor I would have the time to deal with such thing anytime soon as it will also require development work if accepted. The current process works fine for me. I just wanted to show that there are better way than throwing out people. Alex > -- > Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
