Re: /usrmove? -> about the future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 10.02.2012 20:05, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 07:56:28PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
>> and Preupgrade is guaranteed to work?
>> laughable!
> 
> Not guaranteed, but it works within a massively more constrained 
> environment and so certain fundamental issues don't apply. yum 
> distro-sync requires that all currently running applications are able to 
> deal with their files being replaced. Preupgrade doesn't. That's a 
> pretty obvious distinction, and it's why preupgrade is supportable in a 
> way that yum isn't.

and why is this so?
because the feature is introduced ina a hurry brainedead way!

around 350 files

well F17 -> change packages to replace them one by one
with symlinks which could be targeted without stress
even after F17 GA package for package

so F17->F18 could verify this are only symlinks
and remove them or cancel the action with a message
that this has to be cleaned up

but yes, if we make always hurry decisions without thinking
what they may inroduce finally then will always mistakes
happen - hopefully the people acting so does this not
in a payed job and nobody fires them!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux