Once upon a time, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > i have rpeorted A TON of bugs where services was not converted to systemd > many of them are also not converted until now Are you doing this because there is a functionality problem? Systemd is explicitly (mostly) backwards compatible with SysV-style init scripts, because they are going to exist for a long time to come (at least in third-party and vendor packages). IIRC, systemd was introduced without any mandate to switch 100% of the init scripts. In the vast majority of cases, there is no functional difference between a SysV init script and a systemd unit file, so changing for the sake of change (when there is no other package maintenance required) is busy work and unnecessary churn. > and you think my tone is the problem? Well, yes. Filing bugs when there's no actual bug, and being rude about it, tends to not motivate maintainers to make changes. I didn't change my one package with a SysV init script because (a) I didn't see any gain from it and (b) I knew I planned to retire it for F17 anyway (as it is no longer needed). Someone else came along and did it anyway, but that was their choice of how to spend their time. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
