Re: Fedora 16 beta vice Knoppix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 15:28 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:

> Please, don't claim that "udev settle" was a sensible prerequisite. It
> isn't. It has no place in today's dynamic hardware.

Thanks for the correction.

(you might want to talk to the anaconda team, then, because liveinst
runs 'udevadm settle' when it starts up, and refuses to proceed until
udevadm settle is happy.)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux