Re: Fedora 16 beta vice Knoppix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kay Sievers (kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx) said: 
> Any system service that today relies in its core on 'udevadm settle'
> or scsi-wait-scan module, or any of the other bad hacks in that
> category, anything that uses these barriers as a checkpoint to block
> on, to do its synchronous actions, should be considered non-hotplug
> capable, need to be fixed or legacy. The Fedora storage assembly shell
> scripts really need to be replaced by something that fits into today's
> reality.

... which has been the plan for a few years now, but is waiting on
assorted LVM infrastructure work.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux