On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 18:42 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > How about tying the requirement to criteria the component belongs to? > > As in components flagged as base/core/critical might restrict the > maintainer from +1 his own component and require more stricter QA > oversight while components that are not flag as base/core/critical might > not? > > If doable I would think that was a fair compromise... I think that's again in the 'makes theoretical sense but not practical sense' category. The updates we have the most trouble with are critpath updates on N-1 (F14 at present), precisely *because* of the relatively tight karma requirements. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
