On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:38 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 7 September 2011 01:02, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance / > > case-by-case enforcement of this policy? > > I'm guilty of this too; when I file an update that's not getting > enough karma (after a few weeks) then I give it a spin in a *fresh* VM > and test it out like any normal user would do. If this is wrong, > consider my wrists slapped, but otherwise I think it makes sense and > gets things moving. FWIW, I wasn't aware of the policy of not +1-ing my own updates. My approach here (for python/python3) has been that if the patch looks sane and passes the selftest suite, then I'll apply it and create the update. I've then been doing additional testing e.g. dogfooding the package for a while. If I'm happy with my subsequent testing, then I'll +1 my own update, on the grounds that I've been viewing the change from a testing perspective, rather than just from a development perspective. If not, I'll -1 it. I don't feel guilty about doing this additional testing and reporting. [See also http://dmalcolm.livejournal.com/5013.html for more notes on ways of improving QA of Bodhi candidate updates] Hope this is helpful Dave -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
