On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 22:18 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > It is easy to go in circles if everyone is using "+1" with a different > meaning. If you read carefully what I quoted you will notice that I > quoted a proposal to allow +1 comments only from submitters for non > critpath updates. If we use your meaning of "+1 comments from > submitters" this means that the proposal is to add an audit trail only > for non critpath updates. I am pretty sure that you do not mean this. > > So your proposal is probably to allow +1 comments from submitters, but > do not use it to calculate the karma value of an update. But this is a > technical detail. Even with allowing a direct push to stable instead of > using a complex karma calculation formula you will have an audit trail > in Bodhi, because Bodhi creates a comment about this as well. And you > can as well revoke the direct-push-to-stabe direct-push-to-stabe feature > from misbehaving maintainers. That's true, though we still lose the wrinkle that an explicit +1 from a maintainer is a clear statement that "I have actually tested this code". A direct submission to stable is not such a statement, though we could write up the policy in such a way that it was assumed to be one. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
